Wallet infrastructure is a decision you make once and live with for years. It sets where keys live, who can authorize a signature, what you pay as volume grows, and how much of your stack you control.
This page compares Turnkey, Privy and Fireblocks across thirteen dimensions. Each row links to a deeper breakdown. Turnkey and Privy claims come from the published comparison pages; Fireblocks claims come from its own public developer documentation, checked against the source page for each statement.
How the three compare
Why teams choose Turnkey
- Private keys only ever decrypt inside AWS Nitro Enclaves. Raw keys are never exposed to Turnkey, your software or your team, and no single engineer can reach an enclave.
- Every policy is enforced inside the enclave at the moment of signing, so compromising your application layer still does not produce a signature.
- Flexibility is yours, not ours: you define the signing flows, access models and policies, with organization-level permissions, delegated sessions, key reuse across products, and any onramp, bridge or staking provider you choose. Native Earn and Swaps are there when you want them and ignorable when you do not.
- Pricing is usage-based from $0.0015 per signature with no overages, so you pay for signing work rather than for user counts or transaction size.
- And you do not have to take any of it on trust. Turnkey publishes proofs anyone can check, over a build that can be reproduced from source.
Where Privy falls short
- Privy enforces only part of its policy inside the enclave. The rest runs as an off-enclave simulation at the API layer, so a compromise of that layer reaches controls the enclave never sees.
- A Privy signature needs more than the enclave to hold. An authentication service has to hand over the auth share, and further shares sit on the user's device and in password or cloud-backup recovery. Every one of those is another way in.
- Privy bills by monthly active user, so you pay for accounts whether or not they ever sign anything. Turnkey bills per signature, so you pay for work your product actually did.
- Privy runs Nitro attestation inside its own deployment process and lists customer access to attestation documents as coming soon. Reproducible builds are not described in its documentation.
Where Fireblocks falls short
- Fireblocks prices on outbound transaction volume, so the larger the transaction, the more the same signature costs you. Past your plan allowance, overage runs 0.20% per transaction. Essentials is $999 a month for at most six months, and custom plans start at $36,000 a year.
- Staking, automation, raw signing, cold wallet and tokenization are all paid add-ons, so the plan price is not the final price.
- Fireblocks enforces policy at its platform API and in a co-signer you host, not inside the enclave at the moment of signing. The rules do not live where the signature happens.
- Running Fireblocks reliably is your job. High availability means deploying customer-hosted co-signers in active-active mode and running your own monitoring and alerting.
- Fireblocks co-signer enclaves attest to a Fireblocks-operated server, so the party vouching for the code is Fireblocks.
What that adds up to
Turnkey is the best choice for teams that need security and flexibility together. Keys never leave the enclave and policy is enforced where the signature happens, you define your own signing flows and pick your own providers, and you pay per signature rather than per user or per dollar moved.
Turnkey vs Privy: Quick Compare
| Dimension | Turnkey | Privy | Fireblocks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security & Policy | Verifiable TEEs, programmable policies, delegated access | TEEs + server wallets with key sharding; fixed policy controls | Policy rules and quorum-based approvals enforced at the platform API layer. |
| Performance / Uptime | low-latency infrastructure with no single point of failure; optimized for high-throughput, policy-driven signing | Optimized global infrastructure with recent improvements to multi-region performance; demonstrates strong signing speed across common trading use cases | High availability requires customer-hosted Co-signers in active-active mode with separate monitoring and alerting infrastructure. |
| Interoperability | Signing across 50+ blockchains | Native multi-chain support (EVM, Solana, Bitcoin); tiered chain support with varying feature depth | Custom blockchain registration via Blockchain Link (Beta) API per chain. |
| Flexibility | Customizable signing flows, access models, and policies | Opinionated integration patterns with configurable onboarding and wallet controls; deeper customization depends on available APIs and supported primitives. | Compliance verdicts and blockchain link configurations managed at the platform API layer. |
| Developer Experience | Open SDKs, import/export, testnets, fast onboarding | SDKs with bundled auth; limited by abstractions | SDKs in TypeScript, Java, Python; API keys require CSR certificates and co-signer setup. |
| Scalability | Built for high throughput, multi-tenant support, delegated signing | Limited scaling for consumer apps; less proven for complex infra | Scales via multiple vault accounts, round-robin distribution, and customer-hosted Co-Signer automation. |
| Pricing & Licensing | Usage-based pricing, down to $0.0015/signature; no overages | MAU-based pricing tiers + usage and integration fees | From $999/month or $36,000/year custom; 0.20% overage on outbound volume |
| User Management | Org-based access, delegated sessions, key reuse | User-level wallets, session auth | Workspace-level API keys with Admin roles managed via co-signer setup |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, audit logs, verifiable enclave attestation, API-aware policy enforcement | SOC 2 Type II; TEEs support core ops, but blind to API input | Audit logs via API, role-based access control, Admin Quorum approval, platform-layer policy enforcement. |
| Login Methods | Passkeys, email, SMS, OAuth, Telegram, custom auth flows | Passkeys, email, Farcaster, OAuth, Telegram | Not publicly documented |
| Product Philosophy | Infrastructure-first; composability over prescription | Batteries-included; optimized for common use cases | Integrated platform bundling trading, travel rule, and security posture modules |
| Support & Operations | SLAs available; robust audit logs, transparent recovery flows | Community and enterprise support; evolving support SLAs | 8x5 basic support on Essentials; 24/7 premium or platinum on custom plans |
| Integrated Services | Native Earn and Swaps APIs, plus BYO onramp and bridge integrations | Built-in funding/bridging modules; preset integrations | Earn API with lending providers such as Morpho, plus a separate staking API |
Fintech Developers
Accelerate development with programmable wallets, passkeys, and bank-grade security APIs.
Highlights: SSO/MFA • Quotas • API-first
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Fintech Founders
Launch faster with compliant, secure infrastructure tailored for modern financial apps.
Highlights: SOC 2 • Region-aware infra • Recovery flows
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Payments Developer
Integrate programmable wallets into your payments stack with role-based controls and global reach.
Highlights: Role-based access • Quotas • Multi-region
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Payments Product Managers
Control who can initiate, approve, and recover funds in payment flows — with full audit support.
Highlights: Approvals • Recovery flows • Logs
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Crypto Consumer App Founder
Deliver secure onboarding and wallet flows with passkeys, MFA, and full policy control.
Highlights: Passkeys • Policy engine • Audit logs
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
DeFi Developers
Ship faster with secure, programmable wallets that integrate seamlessly with DeFi protocols.
Highlights: Smart contract hooks • Chain support • SDKs
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
DeFi Founders
Launch with confidence using scalable infrastructure, battle-tested security, and built-in compliance.
Highlights: Audit logs • Policy engine • Multichain
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Trading Developer
Build fast, secure trading systems with programmable keys, latency insights, and flexible APIs.
Highlights: Low-latency signing • SDKs • Policy guardrails
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Trading Founder
Protect assets, scale operations, and automate high-frequency trading flows — securely.
Highlights: Attestations • Policy enforcement • Observability
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Crypto Consumer App Developer
Create secure, easy-to-use wallets that abstract crypto complexity and maximize user retention.
Highlights: Key recovery • Chain abstraction • Policy engine
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Web3 Consumer App Founder
Launch faster with embedded wallets, fiat support, and battle-tested infra built for scale.
Highlights: Onramps • Delegated signing • SLA support
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Computer Engineers
Low-level control and composability with secure enclaves, policy enforcement, and open SDKs.
Highlights: Secure enclaves • Signing policies • CLI tools
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Computer Engineering Leadership
Security, control, and observability that satisfy both infosec and shipping goals.
Highlights: Policy engine • Admin controls • SLA-backed infra
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Web3 Platform Developer
Provide wallets, keys, and permissions to your users with full API control and UX flexibility.
Highlights: Embedded wallets • Delegation • Recovery
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Web3 Consumer App Developer
Integrate passkey wallets, fiat onramps, and chain abstraction to onboard users with ease.
Highlights: Passkeys • Onramps • Multi-chain
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Crypto Consumer App Developer
Create secure, easy-to-use wallets that abstract crypto complexity and maximize user retention.
Highlights: Key recovery • Chain abstraction • Policy engine
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
AI Agent Developer
Build agents that sign, swap, and transact safely using programmable policies and real-time context.
Highlights: EIP-712 support • Session tokens • Risk controls
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Agentic Developer
Infrastructure designed for autonomous actors — with approvals, limits, and auditability baked in.
Highlights: Autonomous ops • Approval rules • Audit trails
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Product Managers
Build with confidence: audit trails, approvals, and user flows you can configure without engineering.
Highlights: No-code policies • Audit logs • Roles
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Payments Product Managers
Control who can initiate, approve, and recover funds in payment flows — with full audit support.
Highlights: Approvals • Recovery flows • Logs
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Web3 Consumer App Founder
Launch faster with embedded wallets, fiat support, and battle-tested infra built for scale.
Highlights: Onramps • Delegated signing • SLA support
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
Crypto Consumer App Founder
Deliver secure onboarding and wallet flows with passkeys, MFA, and full policy control.
Highlights: Passkeys • Policy engine • Audit logs
Explore Hub: Docs • Case Study • API Ref
FAQs
How do Turnkey, Privy and Fireblocks differ in where signing policy is enforced?
Turnkey enforces policy inside the enclave at signing time, so a compromised application layer cannot bypass it. Privy splits enforcement between enclave execution and an off-enclave API layer. Fireblocks enforces policy rules and quorum approvals at its platform API layer, with an optional customer-hosted callback handler.
Explore the detail
Which of the three lets me independently verify the code running in the enclave?
Turnkey publishes Boot and App Proofs that chain to the AWS Nitro Secure Module, over a deterministically reproducible OS, application and build system, so a third party can rebuild and confirm the match. Privy uses Nitro attestation inside its own deployment process and lists customer access to attestation documents as coming soon. Fireblocks attests its co-signer enclaves against a Fireblocks-operated attestation server.
Explore the detail
How does pricing compare across Turnkey, Privy and Fireblocks?
Turnkey is usage-based from $0.0015 per signature with no overages. Privy prices on monthly active users in tiers, plus usage and integration fees. Fireblocks publishes plans at fireblocks.com/pricing: Essentials at $999 per month for up to six months and custom plans from $36,000 per year, priced on outbound transaction volume with a 0.20% overage rate.
Explore the detail
What do I give up by choosing Privy or Fireblocks over Turnkey?
With Privy, policy enforcement is split between the enclave and an off-enclave API layer, so some controls sit outside the place the signature actually happens, and your signing flows stay bounded by the integration patterns Privy exposes. With Fireblocks, policy is enforced at the platform API rather than at signing, high availability means running your own co-signers, and capabilities such as staking and raw signing are paid add-ons on top of volume-based pricing with a 0.20% overage rate. Neither publishes proofs you can check against a build you can reproduce yourself.
Explore the detail
Turnkey is the most secure and the most flexible of the three. Keys only decrypt inside AWS Nitro Enclaves, policy is enforced at the moment of signing, and the signing flows, access models and integrations are yours to define.
Pricing follows the work your product does, at $0.0015 per signature with no overages. Follow any row above for the detailed breakdown, read the full Turnkey vs Privy or Turnkey vs Fireblocks comparison, or talk to our team about your architecture.